{"id":2754,"date":"2026-06-01T10:30:08","date_gmt":"2026-06-01T10:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/uslugi\/supplier-and-partner-compliance\/"},"modified":"2026-07-14T16:26:29","modified_gmt":"2026-07-14T16:26:29","slug":"supplier-and-partner-compliance","status":"publish","type":"service","link":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/uslugi\/supplier-and-partner-compliance\/","title":{"rendered":"Supplier and Partner Compliance"},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Suppliers, technology partners, SaaS providers, subcontractors, and group companies may have access to critical data, systems, know-how, and processes. We help build a practical vendor compliance system: from risk mapping, through onboarding and contractual clauses, to an incident response model. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"specialization":[1207],"practice_area":[],"class_list":["post-2754","service","type-service","status-publish","hentry","specialization-compliance"],"acf":{"short_description":"Suppliers, technology partners, SaaS providers, subcontractors and group companies may have access to critical data, systems, know-how and processes. We help build a practical vendor compliance system: from a risk map, through onboarding and contractual clauses, to an incident-response model.","full_description":"Take back control of the risk that comes from outside<\/strong>\n\nSuppliers, technology partners, SaaS providers, subcontractors and group companies may have access to critical data, systems, know-how and processes. We help build a practical vendor compliance system: from a risk map, through onboarding and contractual clauses, to an incident-response model.\n\nA view of an organised supplier-risk dashboard: partner categories, risk levels, contract status, access to data\/systems, incident alerts and escalation paths.\n

CLIENT PROBLEM<\/h2>\nYou can have well-organised internal processes and still carry risk through your counterparties. In practice it is often a SaaS provider, software house, agency, integrator or outsourcing partner that processes data, runs systems, deploys AI or has access to information whose loss hits your organisation directly.\n\n\"Supplier risk does not stay with the supplier. It returns to the company: through data, cybersecurity, management-board accountability, business continuity and reputation.\"\n\nThe biggest problem usually does not sit in a single contract. It sits in the lack of a shared standard: who reviews the supplier, what questions they ask, when legal or security is involved, which risks can be accepted and which require a management-board decision. Without that, procurement works under time pressure, contracts lag behind technology, and the response to an incident on the partner's side starts with improvisation.\n

MOST COMMON PROBLEMS \/ CHALLENGES<\/h2>\nSupplier risk is scattered across departments<\/strong>\n\nProcurement, IT, legal, security, operations and the business each see only a fragment of the supplier relationship. No one has the full picture: who has access to what, which terms were accepted, and what happens if an incident occurs.\n\nWe create a map of supplier relationships and risks. We organise partner categories, access to data and systems, operational dependencies and areas that require control.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> the management board and teams can see which relationships are critical and where to act first.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> the company makes purchasing decisions without a full view of the consequences.\n\nContracts fail to keep pace with technology<\/strong>\n\nContracts often contain general confidentiality wording, but lack specific requirements on cybersecurity, AI, subcontractors, audits, incident reporting, exit plans and liability.\n\nWe prepare compliance clauses for contracts with technology, SaaS, outsourcing, subcontracting and intra-group suppliers.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> the company negotiates from its own standard instead of only reacting to the supplier's template.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> in an incident or dispute there is no basis to demand information, remedial action or accountability.\n\nProcurement is fast, but risk is assessed too late<\/strong>\n\nLegal and security often join the process only when the contract is almost ready to sign. That creates tension, delay and pressure to accept weak terms.\n\nWe design an onboarding standard: questions, documents, criteria, escalation thresholds and simplified paths for low-risk relationships.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> simple matters move faster, and difficult ones reach the right people earlier.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> the company selects a supplier on price and speed rather than an informed risk assessment.\n\nAI, IT and SaaS suppliers have access to critical areas<\/strong>\n\nA partner may process personal data, support HR, sales or customer service, maintain an application, manage infrastructure, or use subcontractors the company does not know.\n\nWe combine assessment of data, cyber, AI, confidentiality, subcontracting and business continuity into one vendor compliance model.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> the company knows which risks are acceptable, which must be mitigated, and which block cooperation without changes.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> an external supplier creates real operational, legal and reputational risk.\n\nThere is no response model for a breach on the partner's side<\/strong>\n\nWhen a supplier reports a leak, refuses an audit, changes a subcontractor or fails to meet requirements, the organisation often does not know who should act, what to demand and how to document decisions.\n\nWe create a response path for breaches and non-compliance: escalation, communication, requests to the partner, assessment of obligations and documentation of decisions.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> the company acts faster, more consistently and with less risk of error.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> a supplier incident becomes a company incident - with consequences for clients, regulators and the management board.\n\nThe company must show control in an audit, due diligence or enterprise-client discussions<\/strong>\n\nMore and more often the question is not only \"what procedures are in place?\", but also \"how does your organisation control suppliers, processors, ICT, AI and technology partners?\".\n\nWe help create a documentable standard: a risk matrix, checklists, requirements, acceptance rules, monitoring and evidence of decisions.\n\nBusiness benefit:<\/strong> vendor compliance supports B2B sales, audits, transactions, certifications and investor conversations.\n\nRisk of inaction:<\/strong> the company struggles to demonstrate control over the supply chain and external risks.\n

HOW OUR SOLUTION WORKS<\/h2>\nWe build a supplier-control system that works in day-to-day operations<\/strong>\n\nThis is not another procedure for the drawer. The aim is a simple, practical model used by procurement, IT, legal, security, operations and the management board - one that speeds up decisions, clarifies ownership and reduces the risk of external dependencies.\n\nMap of supplier relationships and risks<\/strong>\n
    \n \t
  • identification of suppliers, partners, subcontractors and group companies,<\/li>\n \t
  • definition of access to data, systems, know-how and critical processes,<\/li>\n \t
  • identification of risks: data, cyber, AI, confidentiality, business continuity, subcontracting, conflicts of interest,<\/li>\n \t
  • prioritisation of relationships that require action.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nsupplier risk map and a priority list for implementation.\n\nSupplier categorisation by risk level<\/strong>\n
      \n \t
    • classification of relationships into low, medium and high risk,<\/li>\n \t
    • acceptance and escalation rules,<\/li>\n \t
    • thresholds for involving legal, IT\/security, compliance and the management board,<\/li>\n \t
    • recommendations for periodic review.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nrisk matrix and decision model for suppliers.\n\nVerification and onboarding standard<\/strong>\n
        \n \t
      • questions for suppliers,<\/li>\n \t
      • list of required documents and statements,<\/li>\n \t
      • minimum criteria before cooperation begins,<\/li>\n \t
      • paths for low- and high-risk suppliers,<\/li>\n \t
      • how decisions are archived.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nonboarding checklist and question pack for procurement, IT, legal and operations.\n\nCompliance clauses for contracts<\/strong>\n
          \n \t
        • personal data and party roles,<\/li>\n \t
        • cybersecurity and technical standards,<\/li>\n \t
        • AI and automation,<\/li>\n \t
        • confidentiality and trade secrets,<\/li>\n \t
        • subcontractors and further entrustment,<\/li>\n \t
        • audits, incident reporting and remedial action,<\/li>\n \t
        • liability, exit plan, return or deletion of data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\npackage of clauses, templates, addenda or negotiation recommendations.\n\nChecklists for business teams<\/strong>\n
            \n \t
          • checklists for procurement, operations, IT\/security and legal,<\/li>\n \t
          • \"when to escalate\" instructions,<\/li>\n \t
          • simplified paths for simple relationships,<\/li>\n \t
          • warning signs in conversations with the supplier.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\neveryday tools that reduce chaos and shorten the decision process.\n\nResponse model for breaches and non-compliance<\/strong>\n
              \n \t
            • action path for an incident on the supplier's side,<\/li>\n \t
            • templates for information and document requests,<\/li>\n \t
            • escalation to the right people,<\/li>\n \t
            • assessment of obligations toward clients, regulators and partners,<\/li>\n \t
            • documentation of decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nsupplier-incident response scenario and communication rules.\n\nLinking vendor compliance to the company's risk policy<\/strong>\n
                \n \t
              • embedding suppliers in the wider risk-management system,<\/li>\n \t
              • reporting rules for the management board,<\/li>\n \t
              • linking purchasing decisions to risk acceptance,<\/li>\n \t
              • recommendations for monitoring and updating the standard.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\na coherent model for controlling external risks, ready for audit, due diligence and operational work.\n

                WHO THIS SERVICE IS FOR<\/h2>\nFor companies that work with suppliers who have a real impact on data, systems or business continuity<\/strong>\n\nThe service is especially useful where suppliers are no longer only counterparties, but part of the company's infrastructure, processes or growth model.\n\nHead of Procurement \/ Procurement Manager - when procurement needs clear supplier-assessment criteria, faster approval paths and fewer disputes at the end of the process.\n\nGeneral Counsel \/ Compliance Officer \/ Head of Legal - when responsibility, clauses, escalations and decision documentation in partner relationships need to be put in order.\n\nCFO \/ COO \/ Board Member responsible for risk or operations - when the company wants control over external dependencies without blocking procurement, technology and growth.\n

                WORK STAGES<\/h2>\nA simple process: from diagnosis to a working standard<\/strong>\n\nWe start with what is most risky and most urgent for the business. We avoid analysing everything at once unless that is needed. First we set priorities, then we design the standard and implement it where it must actually work.\n\nStage 1. Diagnosis and prioritisation<\/strong>\n\nWe gather information on supplier types, procurement processes, contracts, access to data and systems, and past problems. We identify the relationships that require action first.\n\nWhat the client gains:<\/strong> a clear view of the biggest risks and a decision on where to start.\n\nStage 2. Design of the operational standard<\/strong>\n\nWe create the operating model: supplier categories, minimum requirements, an onboarding checklist, escalation thresholds, document scope and recommended contractual clauses.\n\nWhat the client gains:<\/strong> a practical standard that procurement, IT, legal, security and operations can apply.\n\nStage 3. Implementation in contracts and processes<\/strong>\n\nWe help apply the standard to real contracts, purchases and partner relationships. We prepare clauses, templates, addenda, team instructions and simplified paths for low-risk relationships.\n\nWhat the client gains:<\/strong> fewer delays, less improvisation and a stronger position in supplier negotiations.\n\nStage 4. Monitoring, response and improvements<\/strong>\n\nWe support development of the system: periodic supplier reviews, requirement updates, incident response, negotiations, audits, regulatory change and new technology categories.\n\nWhat the client gains:<\/strong> vendor compliance that does not end as a document, but works with the company.","icon":null,"order_within_specialization":0,"flexible_content":[{"acf_fc_layout":"hero","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"","heading":"Take back control of the risk that comes from outside","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"Suppliers, technology partners, SaaS providers, subcontractors and group companies may have access to critical data, systems, know-how and processes. We help build a practical vendor compliance system: from a risk map, through onboarding and contractual clauses, to an incident-response model.","":null,"heading_tag":"h1","heading_style":"hero","alignment":"left"}},"actions":{"button_cluster":{"intro":"","buttons":[{"button":{"link":{"title":"Book a call about supplier risks","url":"#contact","target":""},"variant":"primary","icon":"arrow","icon_size":"inherit","size":"default","aria_label":""}}],"alignment":"left"}},"media":{"media":{"image":"","mobile_image":"","object_position":"center","object_position_custom":""}},"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true},"variant":"split","mobile_body_card":false},{"acf_fc_layout":"person_cta","person":2695,"section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"","heading":"You can have well-organised internal processes and still carry risk through your counterparties. ","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"In practice it is often a SaaS provider, software house, agency, integrator or outsourcing partner that processes data, runs systems, deploys AI or has access to information whose loss hits your organisation directly. Supplier risk does not stay with the supplier. It returns to the company: through data, cybersecurity, management-board accountability, business continuity and reputation.\n\nThe biggest problem usually does not sit in a single contract. It sits in the lack of a shared standard: who reviews the supplier, what questions they ask, when legal or security is involved, which risks can be accepted and which require a management-board decision. Without that, procurement works under time pressure, contracts lag behind technology, and the response to an incident on the partner's side starts with improvisation.","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"compact","alignment":"left"}},"carousel_settings":{"carousel_settings":{"autoplay_mode":"default","autoplay_delay":6.5}},"actions":{"button_cluster":{"intro":"","buttons":null,"alignment":"left"}}},{"acf_fc_layout":"expandable_box","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"Most common problems \/ challenges","heading":"The most common problems we solve","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"section","alignment":"center"}},"items":[{"problem_title":"Supplier risk is scattered across departments","teaser_description":"Procurement, IT, legal, security, operations and the business each see only a fragment of the supplier relationship. No one has the full picture: who has access to what, which terms were accepted, and what happens if an incident occurs.","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We create a map of supplier relationships and risks. We organise partner categories, access to data and systems, operational dependencies and areas that require control.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> the management board and teams can see which relationships are critical and where to act first.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> the company makes purchasing decisions without a full view of the consequences.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"pink","open":false},{"problem_title":"Contracts fail to keep pace with technology","teaser_description":"Contracts often contain general confidentiality wording, but lack specific requirements on cybersecurity, AI, subcontractors, audits, incident reporting, exit plans and liability.","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We prepare compliance clauses for contracts with technology, SaaS, outsourcing, subcontracting and intra-group suppliers.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> the company negotiates from its own standard instead of only reacting to the supplier's template.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> in an incident or dispute there is no basis to demand information, remedial action or accountability.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"violet","open":false},{"problem_title":"Procurement is fast, but risk is assessed too late","teaser_description":"Legal and security often join the process only when the contract is almost ready to sign. That creates tension, delay and pressure to accept weak terms.","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We design an onboarding standard: questions, documents, criteria, escalation thresholds and simplified paths for low-risk relationships.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> simple matters move faster, and difficult ones reach the right people earlier.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> the company selects a supplier on price and speed rather than an informed risk assessment.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"blue","open":false},{"problem_title":"AI, IT and SaaS suppliers have access to critical areas","teaser_description":"A partner may process personal data, support HR, sales or customer service, maintain an application, manage infrastructure, or use subcontractors the company does not know.","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We combine assessment of data, cyber, AI, confidentiality, subcontracting and business continuity into one vendor compliance model.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> the company knows which risks are acceptable, which must be mitigated, and which block cooperation without changes.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> an external supplier creates real operational, legal and reputational risk.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"orange","open":false},{"problem_title":"There is no response model for a breach on the partner's side","teaser_description":"When a supplier reports a leak, refuses an audit, changes a subcontractor or fails to meet requirements, the organisation often does not know who should act, what to demand and how to document decisions.","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We create a response path for breaches and non-compliance: escalation, communication, requests to the partner, assessment of obligations and documentation of decisions.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> the company acts faster, more consistently and with less risk of error.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> a supplier incident becomes a company incident - with consequences for clients, regulators and the management board.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"pink","open":false},{"problem_title":"The company must show control in an audit, due diligence or enterprise-client discussions","teaser_description":"More and more often the question is not only: \"what procedures are in place?\", but also: \"how does your organisation control suppliers, processors, ICT, AI and technology partners?\".","solution_title":"","solution_description":"

                We help create a documentable standard: a risk matrix, checklists, requirements, acceptance rules, monitoring and evidence of decisions.<\/p>\n\n

                Business benefit:<\/strong> vendor compliance supports B2B sales, audits, transactions, certifications and investor conversations.<\/p>\n\n

                Risk of inaction:<\/strong> the company struggles to demonstrate control over the supply chain and external risks.<\/p>","icon":"","accent":"violet","open":false}],"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true}},{"acf_fc_layout":"box_variants","variant":"process-detail","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"Our solution","heading":"We build a supplier-control system that works in day-to-day operations","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"This is not another procedure for the drawer. The aim is a simple, practical model used by procurement, IT, legal, security, operations and the management board. One that speeds up decisions, clarifies ownership and reduces the risk of external dependencies.","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"section","alignment":"center"}},"items":[{"title":"Map of supplier relationships and risks","description":"","body":"

                  \n \t
                • identification of suppliers, partners, subcontractors and group companies,<\/li>\n \t
                • definition of access to data, systems, know-how and critical processes,<\/li>\n \t
                • identification of risks: data, cyber, AI, confidentiality, business continuity, subcontracting, conflicts of interest,<\/li>\n \t
                • prioritisation of relationships that require action.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"supplier risk map\npriority list","count":"","accent":"violet","icon":""},{"title":"Supplier categorisation by risk level","description":"","body":"
                    \n \t
                  • classification of relationships into low, medium and high risk,<\/li>\n \t
                  • acceptance and escalation rules,<\/li>\n \t
                  • thresholds for involving legal, IT\/security, compliance and the management board,<\/li>\n \t
                  • recommendations for periodic review.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"risk matrix\ndecision model for suppliers","count":"","accent":"blue","icon":""},{"title":"Verification and onboarding standard","description":"","body":"
                      \n \t
                    • questions for suppliers,<\/li>\n \t
                    • list of required documents and statements,<\/li>\n \t
                    • minimum criteria before cooperation begins,<\/li>\n \t
                    • paths for low- and high-risk suppliers,<\/li>\n \t
                    • how decisions are archived.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"onboarding checklist \nquestion pack for sales, IT, legal and operations","count":"","accent":"orange","icon":""},{"title":"Compliance clauses for contracts","description":"","body":"
                        \n \t
                      • personal data and party roles,<\/li>\n \t
                      • cybersecurity and technical standards,<\/li>\n \t
                      • AI and automation,<\/li>\n \t
                      • confidentiality and trade secrets,<\/li>\n \t
                      • subcontractors and further entrustment,<\/li>\n \t
                      • audits, incident reporting and remedial action,<\/li>\n \t
                      • liability, exit plan, return or deletion of data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"clause package\ntemplate package\naddendum package\nnegotiation recommendations","count":"","accent":"orange","icon":""},{"title":"Checklists for business teams","description":"","body":"
                          \n \t
                        • checklists for procurement, operations, IT\/security and legal,<\/li>\n \t
                        • \"when to escalate\" instructions,<\/li>\n \t
                        • simplified paths for simple relationships,<\/li>\n \t
                        • warning signs in conversations with the supplier.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\neveryday tools that reduce chaos and shorten the decision process.","tags":"","count":"","accent":"pink","icon":""},{"title":"Response model for breaches and non-compliance","description":"","body":"
                            \n \t
                          • action path for an incident on the supplier's side,<\/li>\n \t
                          • templates for information and document requests,<\/li>\n \t
                          • escalation to the right people,<\/li>\n \t
                          • assessment of obligations toward clients, regulators and partners,<\/li>\n \t
                          • documentation of decisions.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"supplier-incident response scenario\nand communication rules","count":"","accent":"violet","icon":""},{"title":"Linking vendor compliance to the company's risk policy","description":"","body":"
                              \n \t
                            • embedding suppliers in the wider risk-management system,<\/li>\n \t
                            • reporting rules for the management board,<\/li>\n \t
                            • linking purchasing decisions to risk acceptance,<\/li>\n \t
                            • recommendations for monitoring and updating the standard.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n ","tags":"coherent model for controlling external risks","count":"","accent":"blue","icon":""}],"footer_heading":"","footer_tags":"","actions":{"button_cluster":{"intro":"","buttons":null,"alignment":"left"}},"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true}},{"acf_fc_layout":"box_variants","variant":"box-point","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"Who this service is for","heading":"For companies that work with suppliers who have a real impact on data, systems or business continuity","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"The service is especially useful where suppliers are no longer only counterparties, but part of the company's infrastructure, processes or growth model.","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"section","alignment":"center"}},"items":[{"title":"Head of Procurement \/ Procurement Manager","description":"","body":"when procurement needs clear supplier-assessment criteria, faster approval paths and fewer disputes at the end of the process.","tags":"","count":"","accent":"violet","icon":""},{"title":"General Counsel \/ Compliance Officer \/ Head of Legal","description":"","body":"when responsibility, clauses, escalations and decision documentation in partner relationships need to be put in order.","tags":"","count":"","accent":"blue","icon":""},{"title":"CFO \/ COO \/ Board Member responsible for risk or operations","description":"","body":"when the company wants control over external dependencies without blocking procurement, technology and growth.","tags":"","count":"","accent":"orange","icon":""}],"footer_heading":"","footer_tags":"","actions":{"button_cluster":{"intro":"","buttons":null,"alignment":"left"}},"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true}},{"acf_fc_layout":"cooperation_process","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"Work stages","heading":"A simple process: from diagnosis to a working standard","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"We start with what is most risky and most urgent for the business. We avoid analysing everything at once unless that is needed. First we set priorities, then we design the standard and implement it where it must actually work.","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"section","alignment":"center"}},"steps":[{"title":"Assess and prioritize","description":"We gather information about supplier types, procurement, contracts, data and system access, and previous issues. We identify relationships that need attention first.","accent":"pink"},{"title":"Design an operating standard","description":"We define supplier categories, minimum requirements, onboarding checklists, escalation thresholds, document scope and recommended clauses.","accent":"pink"},{"title":"Implement in contracts and processes","description":"We apply the standard to real contracts, procurement and partner relationships, preparing clauses, templates, amendments, team guidance and a streamlined path for low-risk relationships.","accent":"pink"},{"title":"Monitor, respond and improve","description":"We support periodic reviews, update requirements, respond to incidents, negotiate, audit and adapt to regulatory changes and new technologies.","accent":"pink"}],"cta_text":"Schedule a call about supplier risks.","actions":{"button_cluster":{"intro":"","buttons":[{"button":{"link":null,"variant":"primary","icon":"arrow","icon_size":"inherit","size":"default","aria_label":""}}],"alignment":"left"}},"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true}},{"acf_fc_layout":"contact","section_header":{"section_header":{"eyebrow":"Write to us","heading":"Check which supplier risks need a decision now","heading_highlight_mode":"none","heading_split":{"small_part_text":"","strong_part_text":"","":null,"small_part_size":"","strong_part_size":"","tag":"h2","style":"inherit","alignment":"inherit"},"description":"One conversation is enough to determine whether you need a quick risk map, a clause package, an onboarding standard or a full partner-control system.\n\nIn the form we will ask about supplier types, risk areas, the number of relationships to organise and the most urgent context: a new implementation, an audit, an incident, expansion, a capital group or procurement chaos.","":null,"heading_tag":"h2","heading_style":"section","alignment":"center"}},"person":null,"person_eyebrow":"","person_body":"They will follow up with any questions or recommend a next step.","response_title":"Quick response","response_body":"We usually respond within two hours on business days.","form":{"cf7_form":null,"name_label":"","name_placeholder":"","phone_label":"","phone_placeholder":"","email_label":"","email_placeholder":"","message_label":"","message_placeholder":"","privacy_text":"","newsletter_text":"","button_label":""},"background":null,"section_meta":{"anchor_id":"","is_enabled":true}}]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/service\/2754","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/service"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/service"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/service\/2754\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"specialization","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/specialization?post=2754"},{"taxonomy":"practice_area","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sawaryn.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/practice_area?post=2754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}