an incentive programme that retains key people

We design ESOPs and long-term incentive programs that combine a business objective, clear participation rules, and a secure legal structure-so the program is attractive to people, workable for the company, and ready to operate through promotions, departures, an investment round, or a change in structure.

Most common problems / challenges

The most common problems we solve

Promises of a share in success without clear rules The company tells key people they will have a “share in future success,” but there are no coherent rules on who receives entitlements, when, for what, and on what terms.

we tidy up existing arrangements and design one coherent program mechanism-with rules on participation, vesting, exit, and special events.

Business benefit: the company regains control over expectations and can talk to key people on the basis of clear rules.

Risk of inaction: diverging interpretations, a sense of unfairness, and conflicts on departure or a change of role.

A program attractive to people, but risky for owners Management wants a strong retention argument, but owners fear dilution of control, difficult exceptions, and unforeseen consequences.

we match the program model to the ownership structure, the company’s stage of development, and the desired level of control.

Business benefit: the program can motivate participants without loosening corporate order.

Risk of inaction: the company may offer too little to retain people-or too much to manage the structure safely.

An ESOP detached from governance and day-to-day management The incentive program is created as a “benefit,” but it is not tied to contracts, company structure, decision-making rules, and HR practice.

we link the program to corporate governance, company documentation, and real processes: promotion, role change, departure, conflict, and transaction.

Business benefit: the program works not only at signing, but also when tension arises in the company.

Risk of inaction: even a well-described program can become a source of disputes and manual exception handling.

No decision on who the program is for and why HR, the CFO, or in-house legal is tasked with “let’s do an ESOP,” without a clear decision on whether the goal is retention, recruitment, leadership succession, rewarding performance, or cleaning up earlier promises.

we start from the business objective and participant groups. Only then do we recommend the model, mechanisms, and documents.

Business benefit: the management board gets decisions to take-not an endless multi-option analysis.

Risk of inaction: the program may be formally correct, yet poorly targeted as an incentive and hard to defend inside the organization.

A program that is hard to implement or explain to participants The rules are complex, the documents are difficult, and participants do not understand what they actually receive and when they can benefit from it.

we design the mechanism with implementation, communication, and later application in mind-not only formal document correctness.

Business benefit: the company can present the program credibly and clearly, without constantly explaining exceptions.

Risk of inaction: the program loses motivational value because participants do not see a predictable benefit in it.

Our solution

From an incentive objective to a program you can implement and enforce

We do not start from a document template. First we establish what business problem the program should solve, which group it should cover, and what ownership-control boundaries must be preserved. Then we translate that into a model, rules, documents, and an implementation plan. The service scope covers objective analysis, model selection, vesting rules, entry and exit, the link to governance, and communication and operational risks.

From an incentive objective to a program you can implement and enforce

We do not start from a document template. First we establish what business problem the program should solve, which group it should cover, and what ownership-control boundaries must be preserved. Then we translate that into a model, rules, documents, and an implementation plan. The service scope covers objective analysis, model selection, vesting rules, entry and exit, the link to governance, and communication and operational risks.

Program objective diagnosis

  • determining whether the goal is retention, recruitment, leadership development, role succession, or cleaning up earlier promises,
  • identifying participant groups,
  • analysing existing arrangements and business constraints,
  • setting boundary conditions on the owners’ and management board’s side.

A concise diagnosis of the program objective and a recommended course of action.

Choosing an ESOP or incentive program model

  • assessing which model fits the company structure,
  • aligning the program with the company’s stage of development,
  • accounting for impact on the cap table, control, and governance,
  • preparing a recommendation instead of multiplying variants.

A recommended program model with business and legal rationale.

Exit mechanisms and risk controls

  • good leaver / bad leaver rules,
  • conditions for losing or retaining entitlements,
  • company-sale, investor-entry and reorganisation scenarios,
  • reducing the risk of interpretive disputes.

Rules for how the programme works at the moments that most often create tension.

Programme documentation

  • participant documents,
  • programme rules,
  • resolutions and corporate documents,
  • alignment with the company’s existing documentation.

A consistent set of documents needed to implement the programme.

Dokumentacja programu

  • organising communications for participants,
  • supporting HR, the management board or Legal with the rollout,
  • clarifying responsibilities and the order of actions,
  • preparing the organisation to use the programme in practice.

A programme that does not stay on paper-it is ready to present, implement and use consistently.

Who this service is for

For companies that want to motivate key people without losing control over the rules

This service is for organizations that know an incentive program must be not only attractive, but also predictable, understandable, and aligned with the company’s structure.

Head of HR / People & Culture

when you need to prepare a program for key people and translate management-board decisions into clear operating rules.

CFO / General Counsel / In-house Legal

when the program must align with finance, company documentation, governance, and ownership risk.

Founder / CEO / Board Member

when the goal is to retain leaders, protect control over the company, and create a program that supports growth.

Work stages

A predictable process from decision to implementation

We run the matter in stages so that the management board, HR, finance, and legal know what is happening at each point, which decisions are needed, and what result emerges at the end. The brief process covers diagnosis, model design, documentation, and implementation with operational close-out.

Assess objectives and context

We review the company’s structure, program goals, participant groups, prior arrangements and business constraints.

Design the plan

We recommend a program structure and turn the incentive objective into clear rules: who participates, when, on what terms and upon which events.

Align governance and documentation

We align the program with corporate governance, ownership and existing documents, and prepare the rules and materials needed for implementation.

Implement and operationalize

We support program communications, rollout and practical administration.

Write to us

Turn a promise of sharing in success into a program you can implement safely

We will help you establish which program model makes sense for your company, how to keep control over the rules, and how to run the matter without overloading the management board, HR, and legal.

Fill in a short form and describe where your company stands: whether the program still needs to be created, earlier arrangements need to be cleaned up, whom it should cover, and what outcome it should achieve. On that basis we will come back with a recommended direction for the conversation.

Mateusz Sawaryn

They will follow up with any questions or recommend a next step.

Quick response

We usually respond within two hours on business days.